Subject: Quality criteria for choosing mosquito nets
Author: Africa Malaria Adviser at IFRC
Date: 05-05-04 11:31
Dear Thomas,
Concerning your query on choosing among the mosquito net offers in
your tender there are, besides price, the following other criteria to
be taken into consideration with a ranking:
A Raggedness of the fibre:
1 Polyethylene (5-7 years)
2 Polyester 100 Denier (3-4 years)
3 Cotton 3 years
4 Polyester Denier 75 (1-3 years)
5 Nylon (1 year)
B Longevity of Insecticidal/insect repellent activity:
1 Olyset (Polyethylene) (5 years WHO confirmed)
2 Permanet 2.0 (2-3 years est. not yet WHO confirmed)
3 Pre-impregnated ITN (9 months to max. 1 year)
4 Non impregnated polyester mosquito net (0 months)
When comparing net prices you can calculate the price of one
impregnation at 036 cent/ net for the insecticide kit and 0.50 US$ for
re-impregnation programme cost and multiply that by numbers of years of
ITN use.
5 Impregnated cotton nets have only about half the longevity of
insecticide at the same dose because insecticide gets trapped within
the fibre where it is not bioactive.
C Wash resistance of insecticide
2 Permanet 2.0 (> 20 washes WHO confirmed)
1 Olyset (Polyethylene) (1 week needed to regenerate activity in hot
climes)
3 Pre-impregnated ITN (max. 3 washes)
4 Non impregnated mosquito net (0 months)
You have to calculate price + 036 cent/ net for insecticide kit and
0.50 US$ for re-impregnation programme cost to it to be equal to
pre-impregnate nets
In addition there are other important net qualities that influence
behaviour i.e. usage pattern including the number of persons
protected/net: They include:
1 Size: Often the bigger the better so long as it still fist into the
hut
2 Transparency: often the less transparent the better
3 Colour: Here often dark colours are better because the net looks
clean without washing, some people reject white (Asia) others prefer
white (Togo)
4 "Feel" of the net: here the hierarchy is 1 cotton, 2 polyester 3
polyethylene.
5 Look of the net 1 Polyester, 2 cotton, 3 polyethylene.
Above qualities A-C and size influence price. If the amount of money
is limited it is often better from a public health standpoint to
protect more people with a lesser quality now (and fix this later)
than to protect fewer with top quality.
However each choice must be made given the local circumstances trying
for the best possible fit within limited budget and potential donor
restrictions etc. ITNs are a classical case of "not one size fits
all".
Best wishes,
Stefan